Reserve Bank of India governor wants Public Distribution System to the reviewed

Syed Akbar
Hyderabad, Nov 22: Reserve Bank of India Governor Duvvuri Subbarao on
Tuesday called for a serious review of the overall policy framework
for agriculture driven by remunerative prices and subsidized provision
of inputs to curb the growing inflation rate in the country. He also
suggested a revisit of the public distribution system to bring food
inflation under check.

He was addressing a meeting of Indian Society of Agricultural
Marketing held at the National Academy of Agricultural Research
Management here. Subbarao said the factors driving food inflation
include a shift in dietary habits towards protein foods, pressure
stemming from inclusive growth policies, large increases in the
minimum support prices (MSP) of food grains, shocks from global food
inflation, and financialisation of commodities.

“Inflation is a regressive tax and hurts the poor the most.  The
impact can be particularly severe in a country like India with a
population of 1.2 billion, a per capita income of less than $1500 and
a large share of food in the total consumption basket,” the RBI
Governor said.

Subbarao admitted that the direct role of monetary policy in combating
food price pressures is limited, but in the face of sustained high
food inflation, monetary action may still be warranted to anchor
inflation expectations. “The overall policy framework for agriculture,
driven primarily by remunerative prices and subsidised provision of
inputs, needs to change. Persistent and elevated food inflation over
the last few years has emerged as a major policy concern. Though
protein inflation, reflecting changing dietary habits, was evident
earlier as well, the pace of increase has been sharper in recent years
reflecting, in part, accelerated increases in nominal wages
(MGNREGS),” he pointed out.

Stating that the National Food Security Bill, 2011 is another
potential source of pressure on inflation, Subbarao said its
inflationary impact would depend on the extent to which it will raise
demand for food grains relative to the normal increase in supply. This
will create demand pressures, which will inevitably spillover to
market prices of food grains.  Furthermore, the higher food subsidy
burden on the budget will raise the fiscal deficit, exacerbating macro
level inflationary pressures.

“There is a case for revisiting the subsidy regime for a number of
reasons, including the pressure it exerts on food inflation. Subsidies
on inputs (fertilizer, electricity, irrigation) to incentivise
production and subsidies on output for the PDS system, entail a large
fiscal burden over and above the input subsidies, remunerative MSPs
and procurement for the public distribution system (PDS) at prices
linked to MSP further distort the price situation,” Subbarao said.

Two initiatives, currently under debate, that could potentially
improve the situation are: (a) revamping the PDS to check leakage of
food subsidies, and (b) allowing entry of FDI into multi-brand
retailing.

RBI governor says the sharp decline in Rupee value is due to external factors

Syed Akbar
Hyderabad, Nov 22: Reserve Bank governor D Subbarao blamed the sharp
decline in Rupee on external factors like the debt crisis in European
countries, but the RBI is yet to take a decision whether to intervene
in the forex market to protect the Indian currency from further
slipping against the US dollar.

Subbarao, who was in the city to participate in an agricultural
management conference, told reporters on Tuesday that it was a matter
of concern that the Rupee had been declining in the last two week. “We
are watching the European market. At the moment, we can’t say
anything,” he pointed out adding that the exchange rate is driven by
the global dynamics.

Linking the decline in Rupee to the sovereign debt problem in Europe,
Subbarao declined to comment whether the Indian currency will
stabilize or decline further. “It depends on credible resolution of
the external situation,” he said. The RBI’s intervention, if any, will
be purely based on its policy.

"Our policy is that if the macro-economic situation is impacted due to
the exchange rate fluctuation or undue volatility we will have to
intervene. We are yet to decide whether to intervene or not at the
moment," Subbarao observed.

Continuing its decline against the US dollar, Rupee hit an all-time
low of Rs 52.73 against US dollar on Tuesday morning.

Rangachary panel feels Margadarsi Financiers may default

2007
By Syed Akbar
Hyderabad, Feb 22: Margadarsi Financiers is likely to default in the return of deposits on maturity, feels N Rangachary Committee.
In its final report submitted to the State government on Thursday, Rangachary Committee, appointed to study the alleged irregularities in Margadarsi Financiers owned by media baron Ch Ramoji Rao, recommended that the State government may attach the properties invoking Section 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Protection of Depositors of Financial Establishments Act, 1999.
The Committee noted that even on an readjustment of the values of the interests in the subsidiary companies, "Margadari Financiers will not be able to garner any resources to enable them to pay off the depositors. In the best situation available to Margadarsi Financiers, it can repay every creditor (including depositors) only 49 paise in a Rupee".
"In the circumstances of the case and on the basis of figures available, Margadarsi Financiers will not be able to meet their obligation to repay the depositors," the committee pointed out.
Chief Secretary J Harinarayana reportedly sent a copy of the report to the management of Margadarsi Financiers seeking its position.
According to the Rangachary Committee report, "asset cover that will be available to creditors is 16.2 per cent as against probable loss which stands at 83.8 per cent. Margadarsi Financiers is likely to default in the return of deposits on maturity and its present activity of utilising the deposits raised to fund its ever-mounting losses and for reinvesting in subsidiary companies will amount to their acting in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the depositors".
The Committee is of the view that unless Margadarsi Financiers undertakes any of the following, it will be difficult for the depositors to recover anything substantial from them towards deposits: (i) introduce additional funds from own sources ,if the family owns any properties or assets apart from those disclosed by Margadarsi Financiers; (ii) unlock its equity holdings in one or more subsidiary companies which have a prospect of being looked into favourably by any investor.
"Margadarsi Financiers prima facie qualify to be treated as a financial establishment under Andhra Pradesh Protection of Depositors of Financial Establishments Act, 1999. Under Section 3 of the Act, powers have been given to attach property on default in respect of deposit. Margadarsi Financiers, as its stands today, will not be able to refund the public deposits in full because of their legal inability to raise any more deposits the funds of the establishment having been irretrievably lost by more than 50 per cent by way of business losses and the greater part of the balance having been invested in illiquid assets," the report pointed out.
According to the committee report, out of the total deposits of Rs 2,610.38 crore as on March 31, 1006, Rs 1369.47 crore are irretrievably lost by way of losses. This works out to more than 50 per cent of the borrowings. I am taking the entire amount of losses as funds lost in view of the fact that even on the basis of details available, the loss on account of depreciation on assets was only around Rs 2.50 crore.
Investments in group companies and sister concerns as on March 31, 2006 came to Rs 988.31 crore. Most of these concerns have been formed as private limited companies under the Companies Act, 1956 in which either the entire or almost the entire share capital is held by the family of Margadarsi Financiers. This amount includes an investment of Rs 9 crore in bonds. Thus, the investment in own business was Rs 980 crore on March 31,2006, the report disclosed.
The committee noted that "a perusal of the balance sheets of these private limited companies reveals that most of the companies had filed their account statements with the registrar of companies for the period ended March 31, 2005. In some cases, the companies were dormant and except for the paid up capital and accumulated expenditure to be written off, had no substantial business".
Only one company, Ushodaya Enterprises Limited, had any substantial business; apparently this company carries on the newspaper and television business of the party. The balance sheet of this company as on March 31, 2005 shows a loss of Rs 917.79 lakh for the year that has been written down against the carry forward of reserves of the company. The loss of Rs 917.79 lakh for that year was against losses of Rs 89.63 lakh made for the previous year.
"The trend of business apparently was towards an increase of losses from year to year and I think that it may be safe to presume that for the years after March, 2006, the same will continue and neutralise the past profits that have been built by the company," Rangachary said.
An examination of the balance sheet(s) also does not reveal the existence of any assets that could, in ordinary course of business, lead to a realisation of a value more than the book value, to indicate the generation of sources to liquidate any liability. In most cases, the individual assets of the subsidiary companies like land, plant and machinery etc. themselves had been secured to the lenders such as banks towards working capital loans etc. taken in some cases, huge liabilities towards taxes in dispute had not been provided. Investments of Usha Kiran Finance Pvt Limited, which had depreciated by more than 40 per cent of their cost had been disclosed at cost in the books.
"The investment by way of share capital and application money towards allotment of shares can only be viewed as sunk costs and not available to Margadarsi Financiers as resources available to them to discharge the public deposits. For one, these investments are not liquid and are not available. For another, the realisation of the investments will either result in losses or take a very long period to achieve in view of the closely held nature of the shares which do not enjoy a ready marketability.